[Rets-dev] More about schema overrides

[Matt Lavallee]

True enough, Steve.  And, while the dissension has come from members who
actually have to implement the standard, it occurs to me that the only defenders
thusfar have been consultants.

-Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rets-dev-bounces at rets.org [mailto:rets-dev-bounces at rets.org] On Behalf
> Of Steve Clarke
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:54 PM
> To: Jeff Brush; Rets-dev at rets.org
> Subject: RE: [Rets-dev] More about schema overrides
> 
> I think we need to do better than to agree to disagree.  This is a
> fundamental direction of the RETS standards initiative and we need to
> somehow get this decided.  Maybe we need to get the governance group to
> show us how to resolve such disagreements.  From my standpoint, there
> have been some serious issues raised with the notion of strict data
> validation being tightly coupled with the schema standardization effort.
> The dissention is coming from a pretty diverse group of people, and the
> concerns are very similar.  I would not be satisfied if we all agree to
> disagree and then the standard continues down this path with no
> resolution for the issues.  I believe there were some reasonable
> suggestions, not just disagreement.
> 
> smc