[Rets-dev] On Reference Implementations

[Matt Lavallee]

For what it's worth, Frank, I raised exactly this issue during the last
phone call.  I suggested that no document is accepted before we have a
reference implementation that proves it's viable.

-Matt

Paul Stusiak wrote:
> 
> That's a very good point Frank. Let me see what I can do with that
> idea.
> 
> Frank Wanicka wrote:
> > Ok, maybe "absurd" is overstating things, but if someone had put
> > together a simple standalone app that could retrieve data and
> > photos at some point, maybe RETS adoption would have moved along
> > more quickly. Should the RETS community feel obligated to create
> > one? No, I guess not. Does common sense suggest it might be a
> > good idea if you're not happy with the rate at which your
> > standard is being adopted? I think so. This isn't the first
> > time I've seen this request on the list, and surely there are
> > many others out there with the same need that don't subscribe to
> > the list.
> >
> > _________________
> > Frank Wanicka
> > Real Estate Technologies, Inc.
> >