[Rets-dev] RETS 1.x to RETS2 Resource question

[Matt Lavallee]

Hi James,

To venture a guess, we haven't reviewed Resources (or any of the meta-level
structures, for that matter), so whatever's there is likely the original bridge
work from 1.x to 2.0 that has yet to be revised within the constraints of the
latest data model.

-Matt


On Thursday, July 05, 2007 at 2:59 PM, James Ridley wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm relatively new to the RETS world and am trying to understand some of
> the differences between RETS 1.x and RETS 2.
> 
> For example, in RETS 1.x, resources are a top level item, being broken
> up by class of resource, with the requirement there will be at least one
> class per resource available.  In RETS 2, I see the ResourceList
> containing a collection of resources, but don't see anything
> representing a class specification.  Did I miss something obvious?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any insight you can offer,
> JR