[Rets-dev] RETS 2 Service Document posted to www.ftc2.com
Sergio Del Rio
Sergio.Del.Rio at t4bi.com
Wed May 17 22:30:33 CDT 2006
OK, I must be tired. I thought it was there at some point, but now I can't
see it. What happened to the metadata tag concept that was going to reduce
the amount of different metadata that we were going to have. Did we replace
this simply with different Vocabulary or Data Dictionary versions?
Regards,
Sergio Del Rio
Templates 4 Business Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: rets-dev-bounces at rets.org [mailto:rets-dev-bounces at rets.org] On Behalf
Of Paul Stusiak
Sent: May 16, 2006 3:02 PM
To: rets-dev at rets.org
Subject: [Rets-dev] RETS 2 Service Document posted to www.ftc2.com
Changes for FC5
1. Remove section 2.4
2. Add requirement
R0148 A Provider SHOULD return a fault when an invalid Field Name is used
in a
Query by the Requestor.
and modify the text preceeding to clarify the behavior of Vocabulary under
security and system reductions.
3. Correct select statement for the Delimted ObjectType to use either the
WellKnown Vocabulary field names or the DataDictionary field names.
4. Update R0138 from presented to present
5. Update R0139, adding the preamble "If DisplayGroups are present in the
Vocabulary document," to the beginning of the document.
6. Added a reference section pointing to the RQL Query Language documents.
They
are currently only available on the mirror site and not on rets.org.
The document will be bookmarked and an index added after the final vote.
It is now posted to www.ftc2.com
-----------
Paul Stusiak,
President,
Falcon Technologies Corp.
_______________________________________________
Rets-dev mailing list
Rets-dev at rets.org
http://lists.rets.org/mailman/listinfo/rets-dev
More information about the Rets-dev
mailing list