[Rets-dev] RQL, Draft 4

[Dave Dribin]

On Mar 30, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Sergio Del Rio wrote:
> With standard names having an XPath syntax don't we need to support  
> XPath
> name syntax (ie: bedroom.master.length) so that we can allow the  
> new set of
> standard names to be in queries?

I do remember some discussion about this, but don't remember what  
came of it.  If this is kind of syntax is needed, then we can by all  
means add it.  RQL already allows vocabulary prefixing with a colon:

   vocab1:field = 'foo' and vocab2:field = 'bar'

-Dave